Please note: We do not have the time to check every single link in the archive, therefore some will be dead. Those that we become aware of as non-functioning will be deleted. This is beyond our control as the hosts of the article delete their articles after a said period. Thank You.
Tip. If you are using a browser such as Firefox (Recommended for safety and security) Why not use the Find in page feature to locate articles featuring keywords you enter! If you do not have a copy but wish get hold of Firefox, download here.
This weeks Summaries
and past Links Archives
Click on appropriate pdf
file you wish to download
Daily News Links available in PDF
Click on appropriate PDF file to download
Please note: due to pdf's being downloaded only occasionally now since we have been archiving news summaries in their entirety (Right hand column), we have suspended this facility. However if anyone requires this version for a particular day, please let us know and we will upload upon request.
We appologise for any inconvenience. (Ed)
Monday 3rd March 2008 Not Available
Monday 28th January 2008 (378 KB) (Updated)
Saturday 26th January 2008 (377 KB) (Updated)
Sunday 20th January 2008 (414 KB) (Updated)
UkTabloid
The People's News Portal
UKT Dossiers in Pdf
Exposed
Socialist Worker is an undemocratic and violence inciting organisation. A short video capture of their website unequivocally states their agenda. We have recorded this particular inciting statement for if any reason they should attempt to delete any evidence on their website it will still be available as absolute proof on this video.
Download
or uncompressed Windows media (WMV) format version below:
Archives and Media
Your Research Page!
UKT Not politically correct But Politically Right!
UKTtv
choose category then channel
Double click tv screen when playing for Full Screen
Right Click and Exit Full Screen to return to windowed
Quick Links to Blogs
and Informational Sites
A list of REASONS to end open door Immigration NOW:
Don't just take our word for it! Click on links below to visit
Don't let the Marxist Politicians tell you 'We Need Immigrants''
The Proof is above!
YOU and your CHILDREN are paying the PRICE now,
and for decades yet to come! Unless You say NO MORE!
Why? Because YOU and YOUR CHILDREN Deserve Better!
There is a big, big fuss in Ireland after the leak of a secret British Foreign Office memo updating London on Dublin’s tactics for a referendum on the new European Union Treaty.
The leaked email, from a secure Foreign Office network, is a clear statement of an outlook shared by most EU governments and institutions.
In a nutshell, the Irish government, with the active connivance of other EU institutions and players, is doing its best to make sure that Ireland’s referendum is less a debate than a foregone conclusion.
It is simple: they do not want us to talk or think about what Europe is for.
For constitutional reasons the Irish are the only EU electorate to get a vote on the Treaty that was crafted to replace the Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005. The Irish might be getting have got to vote but Ireland’s rulers were doing their utmost to ensure there will not be a full or passionate debate.
This appears to be main outcome of a confidential briefing by Daniel Mulhall, Director-General on the EU at the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs to a British diplomat Elizabeth Green. Read the Irish Daily Mail’s story, with extracts, and some of the furious debate, here.
The leak, which presumably came from London (no doubt there are red faces in King Charles Street) rather than Dublin, is a fairly frank assessment of the “not in front of the children” approach the EU takes to voters. It surely can not be a unique text.
Perhaps the most domestically incendiary revelation is that timing of the Irish vote (presumably mirroring a similar, though parliamentary, timetable in the UK) has been pushed forward to June 12 to avoid any inconvenient discussion over the implementation of the Treaty when France takes on the EU’s rotating presidency later this year.
“Mulhall said a date in October would have been easier from a procedural point of view. But the risk of unhelpful developments during the French Presidency – particularly related to defence – were just too great. Sarkozy was completely unpredictable,” wrote Green.
The French will this autumn bring forward Treaty plans for increased European defence cooperation. Probably involving Germany, France, Britain, Spain, Poland and Italy (possibly with Hungary and Lithuania too), the new structured “European army” will be organised around euro-style convergence criteria such as defence spending. This is a dynamite issue in neutral Ireland, earlier moves to EU military cooperation in the Nice Treaty were blamed for a Irish referendum defeat in June 2001.
The memorandum notes (something that everyone just “knows” in Brussels), that the European Commission, and other EU institutions have a moratorium on new proposals that could spark debate – and we don’t want that, do we? Plans for an health services directive, harmonisation of corporate tax calculations, the EU’s COSI interior security committee, a job description for the new President and much, much more are all on hold – until after the summer, and ratification, are finished.
The memo is also littered (according to the extracts) with contemptuous references to the capacity of Irish people to decide on an EU Treaty that “is largely incomprehensible to the lay reader”. “Most people would not have the time to study the text,” it concludes at one point. This is a common analysis made by many MPs, ministers, officials, diplomats, Euro-MPs and other great and good opposed to a UK or other referendums. It is, of course, really nothing more than a deeply held wish or fantasy (you lot get on with your busy lives and let us get on with ruling you) because real experience shows otherwise.
During the French referendum, copies of the EU Constitution, a weighty and deeply dull document, became best-sellers as voters rushed to read it. Valéry Giscard D’Estaing, the Constitution’s architect, actually blamed Jacques Chirac, French President of the day, for encouraging people to pick it up. “The discovery of this document was felt by many voters to be an aggression and a threat. It consolidated the negative attitude that the Constitution was too ‘complicated’, that reading it was reserved to specialists,” he wrote in Le Monde two weeks after the No vote.
The truth of the matter is that Europe’s elites do not want people to read a text that was not written for them in the first place.
By attempting to kill off the debate that surrounds a referendum (apathy really is their preferred option), our rulers remove a great chunk of political life from the public sphere, where it can be contested, to the cosy consensus world of officialdom. That is what the EU and this leaked memorandum is about. News Source
(Recap: From the Brussels Journal)
Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union.
In a speech he delivered in Brussels Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state.
Mr Bukovsky paid a visit to the European Parliament on Thursday at the invitation of Fidesz, the Hungarian Civic Forum. Fidesz, a member of the European Christian Democrat group, had invited the former Soviet dissident over from England, where he lives, on the occasion of this year’s 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising. After his morning meeting with the Hungarians, Mr Bukovsky gave an afternoon speech in a Polish restaurant in the Trier straat, opposite the European Parliament, where he spoke at the invitation of the United Kingdom Independence Party, of which he is a patron.
In his speech Mr Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist organisation.
I attended the meeting and taped the speech. A transcript, as well as the audio fragment (approx. 15 minutes) can be found below. I also had a brief interview with Mr Bukovsky (4 minutes), a transcript and audio fragment of which can also be found below. The interview about the European Union had to be cut short because Mr Bukovsky had other engagements, but it brought back some memories to me, as I had interviewed Vladimir Bukovsky twenty years ago, in 1986, when the Soviet Union, the first monster that he so valiantly fought, was still alive and thriving.
Mr Bukovsky was one of the heroes of the 20th century. As a young man he exposed the use of psychiatric imprisonment against political prisoners in the former USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1917-1991) and spent a total of twelve years (1964-1976), from his 22nd to his 34th year, in Soviet jails, labour camps and psychiatric institutions.
In 1976 the Soviets expelled him to the West. In 1992 he was invited by the Russian government to serve as an expert testifying at the trial conducted to determine whether the Soviet Communist Party had been a criminal institution. To prepare for his testimony Mr Bukovsky was granted access to a large number of documents from Soviet secret archives.
He is one of the few people ever to have seen these documents because they are still classified. Using a small handheld scanner and a laptop computer, however, he managed to copy many documents (some with high security clearance), including KGB reports to the Soviet government.
An interview with Vladimir Bukovsky Listen to it here
(Recap: March 2008)
Helga Zepp-LaRouche, a journalist, who is married to economist Lyndon LaRouche and the leader of the anti-EU movement Bürger Solidarität and founder of the Schiller Institute , being one of the world´s greatest Friedrich Schiller experts.
“I think that Europe is confronted with a much bigger danger than the average person knows. In November, French President Nicolas Sarkozy had a closed meeting in Strasbourg with some French European Parliamentarians, and said that if there were a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, in every country where such a referendum would take place, it would be lost. (He added:" There is a cleavage between people and governments. A referendum now would bring (our) Europe into danger.")
So, on Dec. 13, the heads of state had the summit in Lisbon and signed the so-called reform treaty, the Lisbon Treaty. And there can be no doubt that the strategy was to say, "Let's ratify it as quickly as possible, through the parliaments, without public debate—neither in the media nor in the parliaments—of any significance, because if such a debate would take place, it would not go through."
This is confirmed by the leaked email as seen below
The most important is, that it would change the relation of the European states, from an alliance of states into a single federal state, which from that point on, once it's ratified, would be ruled as an oligarchy, without the participation of the national parliaments.
For example, the so-called General Clause means that the European Council and the European Commission would have to decide policies in all areas, except foreign policy and security policy.
The European Parliament would be heard, but have no say, and the national parliaments have no say whatsoever. So parliamentarians, rather than fulfilling 80% of the Brussels guidelines, would fill 100% of the guidelines.
Then you have the so-called Solidarity Clause, which really is a bombshell, because it means that if there is the need to fight against terrorist actions in any country—and the notion "terrorist action" is not defined,
it's a very vague notion—each country, even if it disagrees, has to participate in military action, in wars of aggression, in peace missions in third countries—so, out of area of the European Union—and it basically means there is no more veto right for those countries that do not agree. So, without public debate, or debate in national parliaments, the European Union is being transformed also into a defense alliance with the explicit obligation for rearmament and out-of-area interventions.
Now, if you look at the fact, that of the 27 European Union countries, 22 are also in NATO, where the Solidarity Clause naturally exists also, you have an intertwining of NATO and the European Union, in an almost 90% fashion, and that, if you think about the implication of that, then you understand why
Russia and China have, for a while, equated NATO's eastward expansion with the European Union's eastward expansion. The Russians, I know from many discussions, look at NATO's policy of encirclement of Russia as the potential road to World War III.
If you have a Bloomberg (New York´s mayor and billionaire) fascist government in the United States and a Lisbon dictatorship in Europe, I have the distinct fear that we are on a road to World War III. And how quickly this can go, you not only see in the demand of U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates for more troop engagement in Afghanistan in the south; you see it in the quick action of the European Union in moving on the independence of Kosovo, long before the independence of Kosovo was declared, and where you had complete disagreement among European Union members, but the European Union bureaucracy anyway deployed 1,800 soldiers and police, and therefore, they said, "We don't care what the opinion of the members is all about."
Death penalty in case of crime against the EU state
Professor Schachtschneider pointed out that it also reintroduces the death penalty in Europe, which I think is very important, in light of the fact that, especially Italy was trying to abandon the death penalty through the United Nations, forever. And this is not in the treaty, but in a footnote, because with the European Union reform treaty, we accept also the European Union Charter, which says that there is no death penalty, and then it has a footnote, which says, "except in the case of war, riots, upheaval"—then the death penalty is possible.
Schachtschneider points to the fact that this is an outrage, because they put it in a footnote of a footnote, and you have to read it, like really like a super-expert to find out!”
Now referenda on this treaty are being effectively blocked by European politicians , who prefer to keep the contents of the treaty secret, which they can easily do, since the system is apparently in complete control of our astonishingly silent media. One reason for keepimg the Treaty secret may be the selfamending clause in article 48, pieces 6 and 7 making it possible to change the Constititutional Reform Treaty to the liking of the eurocrats at any time without asking us.
This Treaty makes the EU dictatorship legal!
[...]
In an attempt to rally support for the treaty, Merkel delivered a pro-European speech at the National Forum of Europe in Dublin on 14 April, saying that "the Lisbon Treaty offers the best preparation for Europe's future" and allows the EU to "continue to flourish".
Promises from Margot Wallström leaked
Bertie Aherns likely successor, former foreign minister Brian Cowen, has pledged to make securing a "Yes" vote his top priority
His efforts might, however, be complicated by an Irish government memo leaked to the Irish Daily Mail on Monday (14 April).
The document stated that Commission Vice-President Margot Wallström had told Irish Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern "that the Commission was willing to tone down or delay messages that might be unhelpful" in advance of the referendum.
Margot Wallström notes that the media have been relatively quiet on the rtification process so far. “We need to remain close touch considering the media crossover”.
If any one has forgotten it: Margot Wallström is the 1 vice president of the EU Commission - and the supreme in charge of EU Communication!!! In fact she is the supreme in charge of EU censorship. Any similarity to Carlo Pontis Queen of Heaven is EU-intended!
Declan Ganley, chair of anti-treaty organisation Libertas, said that the most damning part of the email "was the admission that the Government hoped that very few people would actually read the text of the Treaty, and would simply vote with the politicians they trust."
The memo according to an article in the Irish Daily Mail on Apr.14, 2008
According to this article the Irish government has elaborated a plan to deceive Irish voters through a misinformation campaign to make sure the Lisbon Treaty is passed, when it is put to the public. Foreign Minister Dermot Ahern has been assured that the EU will tune down or delay any announcements that would be “unhelpful” Amongst the items reported in the memo are:
- 1. The Government have ruled out a delay in the referendum to October for fear of the French Presidency . They fear “unhelpful developments” during the French presidency. (The email noted that French president Sarkozy was considered "completely unpredictable).
- 2. That Dermot Ahern has sought - and received -guarantees that the European Commission will tone down or delay any announcements that might damage the Yes campaign.
- 3. That developments in the area of Common Defence pushed by the French Presidency would damage the Yes campaign. (Irish voters rejected the EU's Nice Treaty in 2000 largely on the back of a heated debate about neutrality and European defence issues.)
- 4. Concerns of losing support by the Agriculture community as a result of the latest WTO discussions.
- 5. An intention to not discuss the treaty but focus on the overall benefits of EU membership
- 6. A plan to fool No campaigners over the date of the referendum by playing with the date of the referendum - the memo suggests May 29th as the referendum date.
Bruno Waterfield of The Telegraph confirms the story on Apr. 15, 2008, adding: “The fact that the EU Commission is “willing tone down or delay messages” is firmly denied here in Brussels, though often with a knowing simper or wink. Confirmation on the policy is mounting up.
On Tuesday, there was more evidence of operation apathy with the announcement that a consultation on EU budget reform (that’s farm subsidies and Britain’s £3 billion annual rebate) was being extended until June 15 – after the Irish referendum. The extension means the cancellation of a “political conference” that had been scheduled for May 27 – an event that would meant pushed an intense EU policy debate into the public realm”. The rebates are expected to be cut.”
Comment: Ireland is, in fact, the key to our future. Here is a video : "The End of Nations" (1 h. and 22 min.) from the Irish No-Campaign. If you see the video from the 58 minutes point to the end, you will see the shocking explanation for the EU being so keen on this treaty - a necessity for coming enlargements. News Source
Exposed
Socialist Worker is an undemocratic and violence inciting organisation. A short video capture of their website unequivocally states their agenda. We have recorded this particular inciting statement for if any reason they should attempt to delete any evidence on their website it will still be available as absolute proof on this video.
Download
or uncompressed Windows media (WMV) format version below: